User blog:Lyth Streambattle/Unjust Death. White. black, and grey characters alike.

Throughout my readings i have noticed that most of the deaths of villans are all but justified. Take Badrang the Tyrant for example. The killing of Rose was not justified by the killing of Badrang. In my opinion, he should have suffered more before death came to him. Or Fenno, even though he was a Guosim, his death did not justify that of Log-a-Log. By killing him, they were doing him a service. Killing to kill is a service. Killing for the sake of justice is not wrong. It is far from right, but it is not wrong. The majority of the Abbeydwellers are far too softhearted. Another issue i have is the various hordes of villans. Take Cluny's horde. They were only doing what they were told. Should it come to the point of what is moral or not, would you not fear for your life as well? Undue slaughter among masses I belive to be wrong. As contrast, the horde of Gulo the Savage. Killing of innocent creatures is bad enough, but to proceed to eat them? I have a motto, "Blood returned for blood shed." If this is the way it was in the books, there would be no point in reading them. Slaughter for slaughter's sake is pointless. Lets take Slagar the Cruel. Sure, he wanted to escape from the Abbey, but killing a random old mouse in the prosess? He deserved far more than what he got. Or Ferahgo the Assassin. Having to get someone else to do the dirty work for him? And then to call himself a villan. He is unworthy of the title. Although a worthy tactic. A surpluss ammount of incorrect usage of the brain leads to disaster. I have to say that tactic is the most important item of battle. Zwilt the Shade, no matter how much i dislike him for maiming the Sable Quean, had the best tactic. Fortunatly though, Redwall was better.