User blog comment:Argulor/The US illustrations and their meanings/@comment-1859920-20130524174403/@comment-1859920-20130526040315

Chickenhound? I have nothing to say conserning him.
 * sigh* I thought I made my sentiments clear. As previously state, every and all illustrations 'do have to do with the book. Whether or not you think they apply to the chapter they precede, is up to you(and I tell you again, they don't have to apply. There's not a law on that.).

Those random illustrations from chapters you named mean nothing to me, they could apply, and they could possibly not. That's not really something important. Also, for future reference, if there's a chapter-heading illustration that appears to be of a certain character, but you can't find that illustration of the character on this website, that probably means it is either uncertain if that is the character, or the illustration hasn't been uploaded yet. I doesn't just mean that the book is at fault for the illustration.